Category Archives: Strategic Communication

A Sick South Asia: The price of Corruption

Forget stock markets and GDP trends; there’s another annual report that genuinely reveals the health of a nation: Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI). This year, the news for South Asia isn’t pretty. While the numbers don’t directly measure coughs or broken bones, they paint a chilling picture of a region struggling with a disease that eats away at its very well-being – corruption.

Across the board, South Asia scores below the global average, like a student consistently failing basic integrity tests. Only Bhutan and Maldives show signs of improvement, but what about the rest? Stagnant or slipping backwards. Afghanistan languishes at the bottom, Sri Lanka takes a worrying dip, and even giants like India and Pakistan fail to impress.

But why should we care about greased palms and shady deals when discussing health? Because corruption is a silent killer. It diverts lifesaving funds from hospitals, fuels the spread of counterfeit drugs, and silences voices that could expose public health failures. The lower the CPI score, the harder it becomes to guarantee equal access to quality healthcare, a fundamental human right that shouldn’t be a luxury. The CPI is a wake-up call that the fight for a healthier South Asia starts with tackling the rot at its core.

Consider how public health budgets for lifesaving medications and equipment are diverted to enrich corrupt individuals, a harsh reality in many South Asian countries. In 2022, Pakistan’s Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) registered a Rs 800 million embezzlement case against seven doctors and four other officials of the Mayo Hospital for a nefarious scheme, purchasing substandard items at inflated prices, effectively playing with people’s lives.

Meanwhile, a few days ago, in India, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested two of its own officers investigating alleged irregularities in Madhya Pradesh nursing colleges. These officers are accused of setting up a cartel that would collect bribes from college officials in exchange for overlooking issues and granting clean chits. The fake nursing college scandal in Madhya Pradesh, India, undermines public health by potentially graduating unqualified nurses who could put patients at risk, raising concerns about the broader prevalence of such institutions nationwide.

When COVID-19 first arrived in adjacent Bangladesh, doctors worried about the inadequate quality of personal protective equipment. There have also been instances of healthcare establishments providing fraudulent COVID-19 test results at a hefty cost. They went even further, charging a premium for Covid-19 treatment, which the hospital should have provided for free and reimbursed by the government. Instead, it did both.

Transparency International’s 2020 report on Pakistan paints a grim picture, highlighting the widespread practice of bribery for essential services like prenatal care and surgery. In this environment, the poor and marginalized, who are already struggling to make ends meet, are often left with no choice but to forego treatment, perpetuating a vicious cycle of illness and despair.

The Criminal Investigations Department (CID) arrested Sri Lanka’s former health minister and current environment minister in February 2024 for spending $465,00 on lifesaving medications that failed quality tests. Sri Lanka’s National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) claimed that falsified paperwork was utilized to get this batch of low-quality human immunoglobin, a lifesaving treatment for severe antibody deficiency. In the middle of last year, hospitals complained about patients’ drug reactions.

The ‘Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana’ health insurance scheme, a source of hope for India’s low-income families, was rocked by allegations in 2021. Private hospitals entrusted with critical care have been accused of inflating bills, performing unnecessary surgeries, and even refusing to treat those who are eligible. This breach of trust may have diverted significant funds to provide a lifeline for the underprivileged. While investigations continue, the possibility of large-scale corruption casts a cloud of suspicion over this critical program.

Nepal’s Omni scandal during COVID-19 starkly illustrates the insidious reach of corruption in South Asian healthcare. Amidst the pandemic’s urgency, a dubious contract inflated prices and awarded medical supply procurement to a politically connected company (OBCI) lacking relevant experience. This case exposes the nexus between politics, business, and bureaucrats, where public health takes a backseat to self-interest, jeopardizing lives during a crisis.

Looking beyond our immediate borders, the Maldives, despite its idyllic image, is not immune to healthcare corruption. A 2019 Transparency Maldives report found evidence of bribery in procuring medical equipment and pharmaceuticals, raising concerns about the quality and accessibility of care. Similarly, Myanmar faces significant challenges. A United Nations report in 2021 highlighted inadequate healthcare infrastructure and a shortage of qualified personnel, exacerbated by potential systemic corruption.

In Ghana, over 80 children tragically lost their lives after consuming cough syrup imported from India, a grim result of systemic regulatory failures and corruption. This incident underscores the severe consequences of compromised safety standards in pharmaceutical exports, driven by the prioritization of profit over human lives. The Ghana scandal highlights the global ramifications of health sector corruption, demonstrating that lapses in regulatory oversight can have deadly international repercussions.

This discussion paints a bleak picture of how deeply corruption pervades South Asia’s health systems, with disastrous consequences for public health. This begs the question: can we remain silent in the face of such widespread suffering? Given the lacklustre and haphazard efforts of governments in this region to address corruption in meaningful ways, two key actors have a moral obligation to raise their voices and help tackle this issue head-on: WHO and UN agencies.

As the world’s leading authority on public health, the World Health Organization (WHO) cannot ignore the insidious link between corruption and poor health outcomes. Its regional and country offices must become vocal supporters of clean and transparent healthcare systems. Issuing strong statements is a powerful way to effect change. The WHO Director-General and regional directors should publicly condemn corruption in health, emphasizing its negative impact on populations. They can set the tone for prioritizing integrity and accountability in healthcare systems by stating their position clearly. Since WHO leadership now makes statements on ongoing wars and conflicts, corruption should no longer be taboo.

WHO’s ambivalence on corruption and reluctance to highlight how privatization of health services harms public health outcomes has not helped either. The evidence for this correlation has long been available, but there has been no effective advocacy by the global custodian of health. South Asian lawmakers and their families frequently own private hospitals, medical colleges, nursing homes, and schools. It is clear where they would stand in the privatization of health debate. WHO should advocate, in particular, with those international finance institutions constantly pushing for lower public-sector health spending and see privatization as the first line of treatment for failing healthcare systems.WHO enters into three to five-year country cooperation agreements with host governments to outline the agreed-upon work plan. Corruption in the healthcare sector should be a vital component of this agreement with allocated funds. Without this, the WHO becomes an accomplice to local politicians who steal donated money.

Thorough country-focused research and reports showing the quantifiable effects of corruption on health outcomes are another essential strategy for fighting health corruption. Data encourages decision-makers to act, especially when it comes to citizen health. Rather than adding to its already overburdened issue list, the WHO should work closely with organizations like Transparency International and the Boston University School of Public Health, which have specialized expertise and credibility in this field. In such partnerships, the WHOcan help develop clear policies, implement effective oversight mechanisms, and promote transparency in health procurement and resource allocation.

Supporting whistleblower protection within WHO, specifically its regional and country offices worldwide, is a critical aspect of combating corruption in health. WHO employees and collaborators who witness corruption firsthand should have safe and confidential channels to report it without fear of retaliation. The WHO can help expose corruption, hold wrongdoers accountable, and improve healthcare delivery by creating an environment where whistleblowers feel empowered and protected.

Development agencies, the United Nations, and international donors are critical players because they provide the financial and technical support required to drive country-level development efforts. However, due to the pervasive influence of corruption, these organizations frequently face obstacles in their efforts. To effectively address this issue, they must take proactive measures and make more intentional decisions. First, they should include corruption assessments in their country reports. This allows them to understand better the scope and nature of corruption in each country, which is critical when developing effective anti-corruption strategies. Recent UN country reports rarely mention the words “corruption” and “misgovernance.” Second, donors should tie aid to demonstrable anti-corruption efforts. Third, they should help civil society organizations (CSOs) combat corruption. CSOs play an essential role in holding governments and other institutions accountable, and they require financial and technical resources to do so effectively.

Corruption is a human invention; it can be dealt with, even in South Asia!

Published in print on 05 June 2024  in The Annapurna Express

Dr Sunoor Verma is the President of The Himalayan Dialogues and an international leadership communication expert. More on www.sunoor.net

Hashtags

#Afghanistan #Bhutan #Bangladesh #Maldives #Myanmar #Nepal #Pakistan #SriLanka #India #Corruption #Health #WHO #UN #South Asia #Transparency #GobalHealth #GlobalHealthDiplomacy

—END—

“You? A Man?” – A Conversation on Menopause in Kathmandu

menopause nepal kathmandu sunoor verma sexual reproductive rights sex education

Picture courtesy Australian Embassy Nepal

Here I was, walking into the meeting hall for the Australian Embassy Kathmandu‘s “Menopause to Meno-peak” seminar, when I bumped into an acquaintance. Her greeting was as blunt as it was good-natured: “You? A man? On a menopause panel?” A fantastic start, I thought, for the lone male panelist on an all-star female team, especially considering the topic!

Truth be told, from the moment I accepted Ambassador Felicity Volk‘s invitation, I felt a similar sense of exhilaration (and maybe a touch of panic) as when you score a last-minute business class upgrade at check-in, only to realize you’re in your shorts and flip-flops!

Menopause, dialogue and engagement of boys and men on female sexual reproductive health. Gender equity. Nepal Sunoor Verma

Picture courtesy Australian Embassy Nepal

 

But any initial awkwardness melted away when I met my co-panelists. Ani Choying Drolma, the world-famous Buddhist Singing Nun, and Allie Pepper , the mountaineer who conquers peaks without supplemental oxygen to raise awareness about menopause and inspire women. These were powerhouse women, and I was about to embark on a truly unique conversation.

The audience was just as inspiring—a diverse mix of activists, policymakers, politicians, lawyers, health experts, and media of all ages and genders. Their questions during the Q&A session were as sharp as they were insightful, sparking a truly dynamic exchange.

Menopause, dialogue and engagement of boys and men on female sexual reproductive health. Gender equity. Nepal Sunoor VermaAni Choying Drolma on her journey and menopause. Picture courtesy Australian Embassy Nepal 

 

One particularly powerful moment came when Ani Choying Drolma shared her experiences with menopause. In many countries, faith and sexual and reproductive health are seen as opposing concepts. Ani’s courage in speaking openly highlighted the critical need for bridges between these areas. Her talk was a call to action, paving the way for partnerships to empower women on a deeper level.

Menopause, dialogue and engagement of boys and men on female sexual reproductive health. Gender equity. Nepal Sunoor VermaHE Ambassador Felicity Volk, host of this brave discussion. Picture courtesy Australian Embassy Nepal

 

Ambassador Felicity Volk‘s point about integrating #menopause knowledge into existing medical practices resonated deeply in her welcome remarks. We don’t need a whole new breed of specialists but a broader understanding among all health practitioners.

Being the only man on the panel also brought a dose of self-reflection. When the ace moderator Neeti Aryal Khanal, PhD asked how I felt, I confessed to feeling hyper-aware of #mansplaining, #manspreading, and all the other “man” faux pas! It gave me a heightened sense of being on the margins, similar to how many women might feel navigating traditionally male-dominated spaces, especially discussion panels.

Menopause, dialogue and engagement of boys and men on female sexual reproductive health. Gender equity. Nepal Sunoor VermaDon’t give up on us, men. Sunoor Verma responding to audience questions. Picture courtesy Australian Embassy Nepal

 

The complexities of menopause and Nepal’s unique socio-economic context led to some interesting discussions about potential solutions. When invited to share my thoughts, here is what I offered at different levels on the way forward. Some short-term and some more long-term:

Men: We need to listen and engage with women actively. Stepping outside our comfort zones and initiating conversations is a crucial first step. Don’t only listen but take notes.

Businesses: Make menopause resources readily available to your staff. Consider forming a health group that openly discusses both male and female sexual and reproductive health matters.

SRH (Sexual & Reproductive Health) Organizations: Rethink your strategies. Can we truly expect men to support women’s health if their own needs are neglected? Engaging them is essential.

Donors and Diplomats: Link aid to recipient countries to measurable improvements in women’s health indicators—a powerful measure of societal progress.

Women: Don’t give up on men! We may learn slower, but when engaged through the lens of our own health and family well-being, we often “get it” eventually.

This experience in #Kathmandu adds another chapter to a unique journey – being the only male speaker on all-female panels focused on women’s education, climate change and health in Geneva, Kigali, and now Kathmandu, respectively. Thank you to the Australian Embassy Kathmandu, Graduate Women International, and Observer Research Foundation for these incredible opportunities!

 

Published on LinkedIn on 04 June 2024

#Menopause #WomensHealth #WorkforceEquality #Kathmandu #AustraliaInNepal #Menstruation

India’s 2024 Election: Seven Promising Trends

The Indian general elections of 2024, as always, are a spectacle of democracy on an epic scale. Here are seven remarkable trends that give me much hope as a citizen:

One, India experienced good voter turnout over the summer months, with a considerable rise in participation from young people and first-time voters. This demonstrates a dynamic and engaged electorate eager to shape the country’s destiny. Young voters’ passion, in particular, indicates strong democratic involvement and a generational shift in political understanding and activism. The correlation between high temperatures and voter turnout is being studied and will hopefully guide future election scheduling.

Two, the 2024 Indian elections were a technological miracle, demonstrating how cutting-edge innovations can strengthen the democratic process and make it more transparent, secure, and efficient. Blockchain technology was used for voter registration for the first time, making it safe and tamper-proof. This enables voters to check their registration status using a blockchain-based app, preventing voting fraud. AI was also essential for election monitoring. AI algorithms analysed social media in real-time to flag disinformation and hate speech, ensuring a fair and peaceful election. AI-powered facial recognition confirmed voter identities at polling stations, speeding up and decreasing impersonation. Each polling location used electronic voting devices with voter-verifiable paper audit trails. This combination allows voters to validate their vote using a paper slip, improving electronic voting transparency and trust.

Third, these elections marked a significant step towards inclusivity, with a notable increase in women and candidates from marginalized communities contesting seats. According to the Election Commission of India, the number of women candidates rose 10% compared to the previous election. Moreover, candidates from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other marginalized communities made significant inroads, highlighting a shift towards a more inclusive political landscape that better reflects India’s diverse demographic composition.

Fourth, the 2024 elections marked a groundbreaking shift towards environmental consciousness, making them the greenest in the nation’s history. The effort to reduce the environmental impact was evident across various facets of the electoral process. Political parties embraced digital platforms, significantly cutting down on paper use. Social media, mobile apps, and SMS campaigns replaced traditional posters, pamphlets, and flyers, drastically reducing the carbon footprint. When physical materials were necessary, eco-friendly alternatives took centre stage. Biodegradable banners, recyclable pamphlets, and natural dye inks became the norm. Several parties distributed seed paper pamphlets that voters could plant, symbolizing growth and sustainability.

Solar panels and other renewable energy sources powered polling stations, especially in remote areas. This ensured reliable power and underscored a commitment to sustainable practices. Campaign travel and logistics significantly shifted towards electric vehicles (EVs). Political leaders and campaign teams used EVs to minimize carbon emissions. Public transport incentives further supported this move, including discounted fares on election day for voters using electric taxis and buses.

Five, these elections made remarkable strides in ensuring every eligible voter could exercise their right to vote, regardless of physical ability or location. With about 2.21% of the population living with disabilities and many more facing mobility challenges, these efforts were crucial. The Election Commission of India took comprehensive measures to facilitate voting for people with disabilities, senior citizens, and those in remote areas. Mobile polling stations reached distant locations, and accessible voting equipment, like braille-enabled EVMs and ramps, became more common. India’s rapidly improving infrastructure played a key role. Better all-weather roads, enhanced public transportation networks, and wheelchair-accessible taxis made reaching polling stations easier for voters with mobility challenges. All these reflect a commitment to an inclusive democracy and set a new benchmark for accessibility and participation in the electoral process.

Six, despite ongoing tensions and disturbances in some parts, the 2024 Indian elections were largely peaceful, with minimal incidents of violence or disruption. This success is a testament to the dedication and bravery of India’s invisible administrative personnel and security servicemen and women. Their effective planning and coordination with law enforcement agencies ensured the elections could proceed smoothly, even in volatile areas. These unsung heroes worked tirelessly, often behind the scenes, to maintain peace and order, allowing voters to exercise their democratic rights safely. Ensuring that these services remain non-political, are incentivised appropriately and recognised is critical for the country’s democracy.

Seven, the 2024 elections in India showcased the remarkable impact of having a stable majority government, leading to enhanced efficiency and effectiveness across various sectors. This was evident in how all ministries utilized their platforms, communication channels, and capabilities to the fullest to encourage voter participation, turning the elections into a grand celebration of democracy. In contrast, in India’s experience and neighbourhood, coalition governments often result in two steps forward and two steps back, if not three, due to their inherent instability and conflicting interests. The synergy between the government and corporate sector in driving voter education campaigns in 2024 also exemplifies how a stable government can enhance national initiatives, contributing to the vibrancy of India’s democracy.

Highlighting the positive aspects of India’s 2024 elections, the essence of “Sarvam Parartha Samgraha” rings true—’gather all learning for the greater good’. Despite the high transaction cost, especially for a diverse subcontinent-sized nation, India consistently bets on democracy in its long-term strategy. With innovation and a steadfast commitment to democratic values, the lessons from the 2024 elections can strengthen democracy in India and Bharat for generations to come.

Published on 04 June 2024 in print of The Himalayan Times

 

Dr Sunoor Verma is the President of The Himalayan Dialogues and an international leadership communication expert. More on www.sunoor.net

 

Tags

#Elections #India #Leadership #Innovation #Gender #Women #Technology #Enviornment #Election2024

Seven Troubling Trends in Indian Elections 2024

As India votes in the 2024 elections, seven alarming trends that transcend party lines threaten the core of its democratic values and reflect systemic problems within the political sphere.

One of the most alarming tendencies in Indian politics today is accepting corruption as a necessary transaction cost.

Campaign conversations now revolve around the ‘decent’ per cent of kickbacks, indicating a broad acceptance of corruption. Across party lines, all major political parties have benefited from the electoral bonds system’s lack of transparency, which permits unlimited and anonymous donations, creating an environment conducive to corruption. Furthermore, recent corruption scandals involving officials from several political parties demonstrate the bipartisan nature of corruption.

Another alarming trend is the widespread acceptability of violence against women, both within and outside political parties. For example, India’s decorated female wrestlers protested harassment and sexual assault by a prominent politician by sitting on the pavements of Delhi for 4 months, 4 weeks and 1 day, before any serious inquiry was set up. Similarly, the tragic episode in Manipur in which women were paraded naked, as well as the big sex and video scandal in the opposition-ruled Karnataka state, highlight this troubling tendency. Furthermore, the current example of a female parliamentarian being allegedly abused at the home of Delhi’s Chief Minister, who also leads the country’s newest political party, highlights the rot. The absent or at best lethargic response of politicians to allegations of abuse by women showcases the systemic nature of the problem. Tragically this widespread acceptance of abuse stands in stark contrast to the hyper-targeted election campaigns by all parties vying for women’s votes.

It suggests a cynical belief among India’s politicians that women can be taken for granted, are oblivious to such contradictions, or are compliant and immune to abuse.

Perhaps the most depressing trend is omitting critical nation-building issues like education, healthcare, and employment from the current election discourse. These fundamental issues are overlooked mainly by divisive rhetoric and populist promises. For example, in areas such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, political campaigns usually centre on caste and religion rather than tackling severe deficiencies in educational facilities and healthcare services. Similarly, in Maharashtra, while political disputes frequently revolve around regional identity and linguistic issues, the state continues to face farmer suicides and rural unemployment.

Political parties’ lack of transparency and internal democracy is also glaringly visible this election cycle. Most parties have opaque decision-making processes and centralised power structures, limiting democratic participation and internal criticism. This internal authoritarianism fosters impunity and detachment from grassroots issues, undermining democracy. The BJP’s top-down decision-making has been challenged. Indian National Congress (INC) dynasty politics have long been suspected. Regional parties are similarly affected. Mamata Banerjee’s West Bengal Trinamool Congress (TMC) has been criticised for centralising authority and stifling opposition. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which promised openness and grassroots democracy, has also been accused of autocracy and lack of internal democracy, particularly in removing founding members who questioned the leadership.

Nepotism, which prioritises family over talent and ability, is another worrying trend in Indian political parties.

Despite electoral losses, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra remain influential in the Indian National Congress (INC). Regional dynastic politics is seen in Uttar Pradesh’s Samajwadi Party (SP), led by Mulayam Singh Yadav’s son Akhilesh. The Karunanidhi family controls Tamil Nadu’s Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), with M.K. Stalin ruling after his father.

Not only established parties are affected. The Maharashtra Shiv Sena is likewise a family affair, with Uddhav Thackeray succeeding his father, Balasaheb Thackeray, and now his son, Aaditya. In Andhra Pradesh, the Reddy family dominates the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party (YSRCP), with Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy trying to emulate his father. While the BJP has often criticized other parties, particularly the Congress, for dynastic politics, it has not been immune to the same practices. Nepotism within the BJP can be seen as a strategic move to consolidate power and ensure loyalty within the party ranks.

Indian politicians in power and opposition, frequently seek endorsements from abroad to validate their actions and ideas. This craving for international approval is evident in their eagerness to speak at prestigious universities and their emphasis on statements by world leaders that praise their initiatives. These are then highlighted in domestic media, projecting an image of global respect and intellectual recognition. However, this pursuit of international validation can obscure pressing domestic issues. Indian politicians’ reliance on foreign endorsements can divert attention from the critical issues that require urgent and sustained focus.

Finally, the death of ideology across the Indian political spectrum is exemplified by politicians’ frequent party switching, which is motivated more by convenience, opportunity, and the seduction of power or money than by any firm commitment to principles or policies.

MLAs’ repeated floor-crossing has caused substantial political instability and governance issues in some states. This erosion of ideological loyalty erodes public trust and threatens the integrity of democratic institutions as voters increasingly struggle to rely on their elected leaders’ professed ideals.

The Sanskrit term Ātmānaṃ viddhi, or ‘Know thyself’, highlights the significance of deep self-awareness and introspection. It encourages a journey inside to find one’s actual nature and purpose. Perhaps Ātmānaṃ viddhi should be the united minimum programme of all political parties in India.

Dr Sunoor Verma is the President of The Himalayan Dialogues and an international leadership communication expert. More on www.sunoor.net

Published in The Himalayan Times in print on 29 May 2024 

Tags

#Elections #India #Leadership #Corruption #Gender #Women #Nepotism #Idelogy #Election2024

Happy Arch of the Aorta Day!

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we witnessed an unprecedented surge in health communication efforts aimed at educating and mobilizing the public. While the importance of such #healthcommunication cannot be understated, there’s a growing concern of “health communication fatigue” as we risk overloading the public with information. In this article, I will explore the challenges of communication fatigue and offer strategies to ensure our messages effectively achieve public health objectives.

Much like the indiscriminate use of antibiotics can lead to unintended consequences, over-communicating health messages without a strategic approach can render our communication efforts ineffective. In the early days of the pandemic, organizations like WHO took centre stage in effectively communicating complex scientific knowledge. However, as we’ve continued to flood the public with information, we now risk a “HelDemic” of excessive health communication, both digitally and physically. The very “Infodemic” many health organizations aim to fight may be gaining from the indiscriminate health communication these organizations are indulging in.

Indeed, it’s time to address the ever-expanding plethora of health days. We’ve come a long way from marking general health awareness days, and it seems like we’re on the brink of celebrating the “World Day of the Right Kidney” or perhaps the “Day of the Arch of the Aorta.” While raising awareness about specific diseases, organs, and behaviours is crucial, we must strike a balance. The constant barrage of dedicated days can dilute the impact and lead to a sense of exhaustion among the public. We must prioritize key health issues, combining awareness with concrete actions. Let’s not forget that meaningful change in public health is more about sustainable, well-thought-out strategies than having a day for every tiny medical detail. After all, there’s only so much room on the calendar, and we should use it wisely to ensure our messages hit home effectively.

#BehaviouralScience offers compelling insights into #MessageFatigue resulting from overcommunication. The human brain is inherently wired to adapt and filter information to efficiently process an overload of stimuli. When individuals are consistently bombarded with health messages and information, their attention span wanes, and their receptivity to new messages diminishes. This concept is known as habituation, a fundamental principle in psychology. When people encounter the same information repeatedly without novelty or a clear call to action, they become desensitized, rendering subsequent messages less effective. Additionally, cognitive load theory highlights that excessive information can overwhelm the brain’s limited mental resources, decreasing message retention and comprehension. To combat #messagefatigue, it is essential to apply behavioural science principles, such as novelty, relevance, and clarity, in health communication strategies, ensuring that messages are frequent, engaging, resonant, and actionable.

The primary challenge is balancing the need for information dissemination and the risk of communication fatigue. To do this effectively, we must prioritize and strategically choose critical health days for communication. Rather than inundating the public with continuous events and messages, we should focus on a select few that have the most significant impact in the context of each country’s morbidity and mortality data.

Similarly, before choosing the health day to mark and encourage the population to take action, check if you have created the necessary infrastructure and trained the health staff. Only talking and having no facilities supporting action will reduce the audience’s trust in you as a communicator. Let’s take a page from the Singaporean playbook, a country celebrated for its strategic approach to health campaigns. Unlike the chaotic flurry of information that can overwhelm public health communication efforts, Singapore opts for a more measured strategy. They first build the necessary infrastructure, invest in training their healthcare staff, and only then launch well-thought-out health campaigns. This method ensures that the communication aligns with the country’s capabilities and resources. For instance, their successful ‘War on Diabetes’ campaign was launched after setting up a nationwide system for diabetes prevention, care, and treatment. It’s a testament to how governments can measure health communication, focusing on sustainable actions over flashy announcements.

For low-income countries heavily reliant on foreign aid, public officials may focus excessively on marking health days prioritized by donors. This diverts their attention from core responsibilities and risks undermining domestic ownership and sustainability. Striking the right balance is essential and requires local health leadership to have a spine and be incorruptible.

A shining example of this approach is the nation of #Rwanda, which, after experiencing a devastating genocide in 1994, has risen like a phoenix, demonstrating the power of local stewardship. The Rwandan government has taken control of its #DevelopmentAgenda and #HealthCommunication strategies, ensuring that international donors align with their priorities. As a result, they’ve seen remarkable improvements in healthcare access, education, and infrastructure, reducing child mortality and infectious diseases.

#StrategicHealthCommunication is critical, especially in low-income nations with limited resources. It involves profoundly understanding the local context, target audience, and the cultural factors affecting health behaviours. Effective strategies include audience analysis, evidence-based messaging, channel selection, deliberate message distribution, and rigorous monitoring and evaluation.

In a post-colonial world, #LeadershipCommunication plays a pivotal role in low-income countries, where building trust, mobilizing resources, influencing behaviour change, strengthening health systems, and managing crises are paramount. National health leaders must communicate effectively to instil trust, mobilize resources, drive behaviour change, and forge alliances to strengthen health systems. Above all, it requires national health leaders to be loyal to their mandate and not merely in the service of international donors.

For health leaders, national and international, talking selectively, concretely, and effectively may be better at preventing health message fatigue than generating endless noise using fluff and jargon to have their faces plastered over posts and posters.

As we move forward post-COVID-19, it’s crucial to recognize the potential pitfalls of health communication fatigue. Strategic health communication and effective leadership communication are essential to navigate this landscape successfully. By striking the right balance, prioritizing critical health days, and ensuring that public officials don’t lose sight of their core responsibilities, we can ensure that our public health messages effectively achieve our goals.

Learning from Rwanda’s Rise: Insights from the Kigali Global Dialogue Forum 2023

Dr Sunoor Verma speaking at the Kigali Global Dialogue 2023 Interview with Dr Sunoor Varma

Global Development Strategist and Leadership Communication expert

The developmental experiences of Rwanda and their applicability to countries such as Nepal are explored in an interview with Dr Sunoor Verma.

The Kigali Global Dialogue Forum is a one-of-a-kind forum that brings together representatives from developing countries to discuss major global issues. It is organised by India’s Observer Research Foundation (ORF) and the Rwanda Governance Board. Set against Rwanda’s incredible growth and development, this selected event focuses on inclusive conversation, bringing varied perspectives, and supporting gender equity. The critical findings are the importance of open discussions, regional alliances, and issue-based collaborations among developing nations.

Welcome to Nepal News Agency. Dr Sunoor Verma will be with us today to discuss developing countries such as Nepal and Rwanda. You were recently invited to speak at the Kigali Global Dialogue; please explain your personal experience and impressions of participating in this unique event in Rwanda.

Dr Sunoor Verma: The Kigali Global Dialogue is a truly unique platform for debate that is convened by two highly credible organisations, the Observer Research Foundation, India and the Rwanda Governance Board, and it brings together a diverse range of voices from developing countries. This dialogue is known for ensuringa significant presence of women speakers, which is not always the case at international events.”

Another thing that makes the Kigali Global Dialogue special is that it’s held in Rwanda, one of Africa’s fastest-growing economies. It’s an inspiring place to be, giving us a glimpse of what’s possible for developing countries.

The topics discussed at the Kigali Global Dialogue are also very bold. They don’t shy away from complex issues; participants can express their views without worrying about pleasing donors or funding sources. This makes for a candid exchange of ideas essential for developing countries.

The Kigali Global Dialogue is an invaluable platform for developing countries to come together, discuss critical issues, and learn from each other’s experiences. I’m grateful for the opportunity to participate in this year’s event, and I look forward to returning.

Can you share some insights that you gained from participating in the dialogue?

Dr Sunoor Verma: One of the most significant insights I gained from the dialogue was the continued relevanceof dialogue between developing countries. Too often, the conversation about development is dominated by developed countries, who may not always understand the unique challenges and opportunities facing developing countries. The Kigali Global Dialogue was a refreshing change of pace, as it was a platform for developing countries to come together and share their experiences. This was incredibly valuable; we could learn from each other and build relationships. Another insight I gained was the importance of regional alliances and issue-based alliances. In today’s world, it is no longer enough to focus on national development simply. We need to work with our neighbours and countries facing similar challenges. This is the only way to achieve sustainable development. The Kigali Global Dialogue was a wake-up call for many. It is a sobering reminderthat developing countries have the power to shape their destiny. We must continue coming together, sharing our experiences, and building alliances. Together, we can create a better future for all as long as there are credible hosts, such as the Observer Research Foundation and the Rwanda Governance Board, whose intentions are trusted.

Dr Sunoor Verma speaking at Kigali Global Dialogue 2023

So the dialogue was held in Rwanda, and its Kigali Global Dialogue and such dialogues have helped the country garner international attention; so can you elaborate on how these dialogues have effectively promoted Rwanda’s achievements and helped foster global engagement?

Dr Sunoor Verma: The Kigali Global Dialogue is a powerful asset for Rwanda to showcase its achievements to the world without being a pony show. It brings together a wide range of influential people from all over the world who get to see firsthand Rwanda’s progress in recent years. This year’s dialogue, for example, brought together people from over 70 countries. They had the opportunity to learn about Rwanda’s economic growth, its commitment to good governance, and its progress in education and healthcare. They also had the chance to meet with Rwandan policymakers and business leaders and discuss ways to collaborate on future projects.

However, The Kigali Global Dialogue is not just about promoting Rwanda’s achievements. It is also about fostering global engagement. When policymakers and business leaders worldwide come together in Kigali, they can build relationships and share ideas. This can lead to new partnerships and new development opportunities.

Rwanda has made some significant improvement in development despite the genocide that occurred not long ago, so what are the factors or strategies that do you believe contributed to Rwanda’s transformation into current Africa’s fastest developing nation?

Dr Sunoor Verma: Rwanda’s transformation always inspires me; it is a remarkable story of how a country can overcome a horrific past and build a brighter future. Many factors have contributed to Rwanda’s success, but I believe the most important ones are visionary leadership, good governance, and investment in human capital.

President Paul Kagame has been a visionary leader for Rwanda. He has articulated a clear vision for the country’s future and has been committed to implementing it. He has also created a robust, stable government focused on good governance and transparency. This has created an environment where businesses can thrive, and people can live in peace and security.

Rwanda has also invested heavily in education and healthcare. This has led to a significant improvement in the quality of life for its citizens. The country now has one of the highest literacy rates in Africa and is also making progress in reducing poverty and malnutrition. Rwanda is also a leader in gender equality, with women making up more than half of the parliament. I am confident that Rwanda will continue to thrive in the future.

I speak passionately about Rwanda’s transformation because it is a model for other developing countries. The principles of visionary leadership, good governance, gender equity and investment in human capital are the same principles that I believe can be applied to other developing countries.

As you said, the society was torn from violence and ethnicity, and now it is embracing its unity; that transition is indeed remarkable for a landlocked country or small country like Rwanda, so what do you believe are the key factors that enable this transition and how can other countries with a similar situation, similar socio-economic problems can learn from Rwanda’s experience.

Dr Sunoor Verma speaking at Kigali Global Dialogue 2023

Dr Sunoor Verma: Rwanda’s transition from a country torn by violence and ethnicity to embracing unity is remarkable. It is a story of how a country can overcome a complicated past and build a brighter future. Many factors have contributed to Rwanda’s success, but the most important ones are leadership, reconciliation and gender equality.

Leadership is essential for any country that wants to achieve its goals. President Paul Kagame has understood the importance of Reconciliation in Rwanda and has taken steps to promote it. He has also committed to gender equality, and women now play a leading role in all aspects of Rwandan society.

Reconciliation is another essential ingredient for peace and unity. Rwanda has taken several steps to promote Reconciliation, including creating a system of local courts and local bodies to help people reconcile with each other. The country has also integrated the issue of Reconciliation into its school curriculums.

Gender equality is also essential for peace and unity. When women are empowered, they are more likely to be involved in decision-making and promote peace. Rwanda has made significant progress in gender equality; women now comprise more than half of the parliament.

Reconciliation is a difficult process, but it is critical in countries that have suffered genocide or other mass tragedies. It is the only way to fully move past the past and create a better future for everyone. Reconciliation does not imply ignoring the past. It is about remembering the past in order to create a better future. It is about acknowledging the grief and suffering inflicted and working together to find a way forward. It is a matter of forgiveness, not forgetting. It is about justice, but not about vengeance. It is a process of healing, not forgetting.

Rwanda has focused a lot on agricultural development to progress since the genocide. Nepal is also an agro-based country, so what methods used by the people of Rwanda can be applicable for Nepal to develop agriculturally?

Dr Sunoor Verma: Rwanda is a remarkable example of a country that has transformed itself from a low-income, post-conflict country to a high-performing economy in just two decades. One of the key drivers of this transformation has been Rwanda’s focus on agricultural development.

Rwanda has invested heavily in agriculture, both in terms of infrastructure and technology. The country has built a network of irrigation canals and dams and introduced new technologies such as drip irrigation and solar-powered pumps. This has helped to increase agricultural productivity and reduce vulnerability to drought.Rwanda has also invested in agricultural research and development. The country has established several agricultural research centres and partnered with international organisations such as the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) to develop new varieties of crops resistant to pests and diseases.

In addition to infrastructure and technology, Rwanda has also focused on good governance and gender equity in agriculture. The government has put in place many policies to promote women’s participation in agriculture and has also made efforts to reduce corruption in the agricultural sector.

As a result of these investments, Rwanda has achieved significant progress in agricultural development. The country’s agricultural output has doubled in the past two decades, and poverty has been reduced by half.

Nepal can learn a great deal from Rwanda’s experience in agricultural development. Nepal is also agro-based, facing many of the same challenges as Rwanda. However, Nepal has the potential to achieve similar results if it invests in infrastructure, technology, good governance, and gender equity in agriculture. I am confident that Nepal can follow in Rwanda’s footsteps and transform into a high-performing economy. It is only a matter of commitment and determination.

For a country like Nepal which is quite similar to Rwanda as it has faced many transitions in the political system, it is now a democratic country experiencing several changes in the political system. So in your view, what aspects of Rwanda’s governance leadership and policies can benefit countries like Nepal facing similar political changes

Dr Sunoor Verma speaking at Kigali Global Dialogue 2023

Dr Sunoor Verma: I have been impressed by Rwanda’s progress in recent years, and I believe that the country has much to offer other developing countries facing similar political changes.

One of the most striking things about Rwanda is its political vision. The government has a clear and long-term plan for the country and has been able to implement this plan effectively. This is in contrast to many other developing countries, which often have frequent changes of government and lack a clear vision for the future.

Another critical aspect of Rwanda’s governance is its political stewardship. The government has channelled international support and technical assistance in a way that has benefited the country as a whole. This contrasts with many other developing countries, where international aid is often fragmented and does not reach the people who need it most.

Finally, Rwanda has made significant progress in gender equality. This contrasts with many other developing countries, where women, including Nepal, are still underrepresented in decision-making roles.

I believe these three aspects of Rwanda’s governance can benefit other developing countries facing similar political changes. If these countries can create a clear vision for the future, channel international support effectively, and promote gender equality, they can achieve significant progress in their development.

I am particularly passionate about the issue of gender equality. I believe that when women are empowered, they can make a real difference in the development of their countries. Rwanda is an excellent example of a country that has benefited from gender equality. I hope other developing countries will follow Rwanda’s example and allow women to lead their societies.

As you said before, Rwanda has garnered a lot of tourist attention. Nepal is also a little bit inclined towards tourism development. It is trying to develop more tourism in the country. It has more tourist attractions than Rwanda, but still, it is not as successful as Rwanda. So what could be the cause behind it and what steps can Rwanda take, and what methods that Rwanda has applied can be applicable in Nepal in developing the tourism sector?

Dr Sunoor Verma: Nepal is a beautiful country with a lot to offer tourists, but it has not been as successful as Rwanda in attracting tourists. If we analyse how Rwanda has achieved this feat of attracting high-value, high, spending tourists, we will find that the answers lie in good governance, branding, and infrastructure.

Good governance: Rwanda has a reputation for being a well-governed country with low levels of corruption. This is important for tourism, as tourists want to feel safe and secure when they travel. Lesson number one- Corruption deters high-spending tourists from visiting a country.

Branding: Rwanda has done an outstanding job branding itself as a tourist destination. The country is known for its gorillas, beautiful scenery, and friendly people. The lesson, Two: Political and economic instability is not conducive to solid branding.

Infrastructure: Rwanda has invested heavily in infrastructure, such as roads, airports, and hotels. This makes it easy for tourists to get around the country and enjoy their visit. Lesson, Three: infrastructure for safe connectivity and secure accommodation is critical.

In addition to these three areas, Nepal can also improve its tourism sector by addressing the following issues:

Gender equality: Nepal has a long history of gender inequality. This can deter female tourists from visiting the country. Nepal needs to do more to promote gender equality and to create a more welcoming environment for female tourists.

Tourism education: Nepal needs to invest in tourism education. This will help to create a more skilled workforce in the tourism sector and will also help to raise awareness of the importance of tourism.

Sustainable tourism: Nepal needs to develop sustainable tourism practices. This will help to protect the environment and to ensure that tourism benefits the local community.

I believe that Nepal has the potential to become a significant tourist destination. However, it needs to address its challenges to realise its full potential.

Lastly, what do you think, methods or formulas Rwanda used to be this successful within two decades? And how would you compare their political system and their development with Nepal’s development?

Dr Sunoor Verma: I have been working in international development for over 20 years and have seen many countries progress, but Rwanda is one of the most impressive success stories. In just two decades, Rwanda has transformed from a country ravaged by genocide to a thriving and prosperous nation.

Many factors have contributed to Rwanda’s success, but I believe that the following are the most important:

Evidence-based decision-making: Rwandan leaders have committed to using evidence to guide their decisions. This means that they have invested in research and analysis and are willing to change course if the evidence shows that they are on the wrong track.

Political will: Rwandan leaders have shown a strong commitment to development. They have made it a priority to improve the lives of their citizens, and they have been willing to make difficult decisions to achieve their goals. There appears to be an agreement among the politicians of Rwanda on a common minimum national interest agenda.

Gender equality: Rwanda has made significant progress in gender equality. Women comprise more than half of the parliament, leading in all aspects of society. This has helped to create a more just and equitable society, and it has also contributed to economic growth.

Public participation: Rwandan leaders have committed to public involvement. They consult with citizens regularly, and they are responsive to their feedback. This has helped build trust between the government and the people, making it easier to implement reforms.

Finally, the Rwandan leadership has maintained stewardship of its National Development agenda and has not allowed foreign interference while being open to considering global best practices.

Published in Polar News, Nepal on 17 August 2023

Dr Sunoor Verma speaking at the Kigali Global Dialogue 2023

PM Modi’s Masterclass in Leadership Communication

Prime Minister Modi delivers a masterclass in leadership communication

Leadership communication skills are essential for any leader who wants to be successful. They involve the ability to speak clearly and concisely, to connect with an
audience, and to persuade them to your point of view. By analyzing speeches broadcast on audio-visual mediums, we can gain insights into how leaders communicate and use their communication skills to persuade and connect with others. This can be helpful for anyone who wants to improve their #leadershipcommunication skills.

India’s Prime Minister, Mr Narendra Modi, delivered a master class in political #LeadershipCommunication in parliament on August 10, 2023, when a no-confidence resolution was presented against his administration. Mr Modi accused the opposition of having no faith in India, believing those who mocked the country, and being arrogant and incompetent. He also stated that the more they tried to stop him, the more successful he became.

Here is my analysis of Mr Modi’s masterclass.

A combo of leadership & strategic communication

Mr Modi’s speech was effective in several ways. First, Timing: First and foremost, it was well-timed. The no-confidence resolution was introduced two days after Mr Modi’s party, the BJP won the municipal by-elections in Gujarat. This allowed Mr Modi to capitalize on the BJP’s momentum and depict the opposition as out of touch with the country’s spirit. As a result, this speech can also be classified under #StrategicCommunication.

Second, Arguments: Mr Modi’s speech was well-thought-out. He emphasized the government’s accomplishments in the economy, infrastructure, and social welfare sectors. He also accused the opposition of being to blame for many of the country’s problems, such as corruption and communalism.

Third, Delivery: Mr Modi addressed his remarks with passion and conviction. He addressed the people personally and stated unequivocally that he would not back down from the opposition’s challenges. This added urgency and enthusiasm to his address, which helped energize his followers.

How He Used Rhetorical Devices to Connect with the Audience

Mr Modi utilized a variety of rhetorical tactics in his speech. Here are some concrete examples:

  • Ethos: Mr Modi appealed to the audience’s patriotism by discussing India’s accomplishments and accusing the opposition of being unpatriotic.
  • Pathos: Mr Modi played on the audience’s emotions by speaking about the difficulties that regular people endure and blaming the opposition of being to blame for these difficulties.
  • Logos: Mr Modi used facts and data to support his statements about the government’s accomplishments.

Mr Modi also used other rhetorical tactics in his address, including humour, repetition, and contrast. He effectively employed these techniques to connect with the audience and present his point of view.

Modi’s Hindi Skills Gave Him an Advantage in the No-Confidence Motion

Mr Modi’s grasp of Hindi was a significant asset in the no-confidence vote. Despite being a non-native speaker, he could communicate with his audience in Hindi fluently and confidently. In contrast, his opponents were not fluent in Hindi and frequently made errors. This enhanced Mr Modi’s credibility and intelligence, giving him an advantage in the argument.

How He Synced His Body Language with His Verbal Messages

Mr Modi’s body language, in addition to his rhetorical abilities, contributed to the effectiveness of his speech. He conveyed confidence, authority, and determination through various nonverbal cues.

  • Eye contact: Mr Modi made intense eye contact with the audience throughout his speech. This showed that he was confident and in control.
  • Posture: Mr Modi stood tall and upright throughout his speech. This gave the impression of strength and power.
  • Gestures: Mr Modi used several gestures to emphasize his points. For example, he would often point his finger to make a point or spread his arms wide to show his confidence.
  • Facial expressions: Mr Modi smiled often and looked friendly and approachable. This made him seem more relatable to the audience.

Mr Modi’s body language matched his spoken statement, resulting in a dramatic and compelling effect. His determination and confidence were contagious, and they rallied his parliamentary group.

Here are some specific examples of how Mr Modi’s body language worked in his favour:

  • When he talked about India’s accomplishments, he would proudly lift his palms in the air and smile. This demonstrated his pride in India’s success and optimism about its future.
  • When he accused the opposition of being unpatriotic, he would shake his head and point his finger at them. This demonstrated that he was angry with them and did not trust them.
  • He would drop his voice and sound worried when discussing the difficulties that everyday people experience. This demonstrated that he was sympathetic to their situation and determined to assist them.

How He Used His Attire to Project an Image of Power and Confidence

Mr Modi’s outfit also contributed to his image of power and confidence. The white kurta-pyjama represents purity, but the Nehru jacket represents power and authority. This confluence of symbols aided Mr Modi in projecting an image of a strong and capable leader who was in touch with the people. His formal dress made him appear more powerful and in charge when he accused the opposition of being out of touch with the people. Similarly, as he discussed India’s accomplishments, his immaculate dress made him appear proud and confident. On the other hand, his projected opponent wore a white half-sleeve shirt that conveyed informality and casualness.

How He Played on the Weaknesses of His Opponents

In addition to Mr Modi’s own rhetorical abilities and body language, his opponents’ poorly constructed speeches also aided him in defeating the no-confidence motion. The opposition leaders spoke in a rambling and nonsensical style, making them appear weak and ineffective. They did not attempt to engage with Mr Modi’s views. This gave their speeches the appearance of rage, undermining their credibility and making Mr Modi’s speech appear more persuasive.

The reason why Mr Modi’s speech in the Indian parliament on August 10, 2023, was a masterclass in political #leadershipcommunication is because ultimately the proof is in the pudding- Mr Modi defeated the no-confidence motion with a compelling margin.

Dr Sunoor Verma is an expert in advocacy and strategic leadership communication. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr Sunoor provided in-person crisis, risk, and leadership communication training to over 300 Nepalese parliamentarians on behalf of WHO. He also coached four Ministers of Health and four Ministry of Health spokespersons in strategic and crisis communication.

Dr Sunoor has advised WHO, UNICEF, UNHCR, UNDP, ECMI, and their leaders in developing sophisticated coalitions, successfully communicating, and inventing out-of-the-box solutions in development and humanitarian settings. He has also collaborated on international relations, global health, and conflict resolution programmes with Boston University, the University of Geneva, and Cambridge University. Dr Verma coaches and advises elected officials and technocrats in practical science and crisis communication as part of his leadership communication practice.

The art of making a massive health impact.

public health communication multi-stakeholder engagement singapore

A call to active lifestyle by Singapore health authorities.

How can a small island nation with a multi-ethnic and multilingual citizenry and four official languages become a global champion in health communication? The answer is to use scientific evidence effectively, to be proactive in responding to evolving trends, to employ many communication channels, and to tailor messages to diverse audiences. And the country with this extraordinary feat will be 58 on August 9, 2023. It’s #Singapore!

Singapore’s demographics are rapidly shifting, posing significant challenges for the country’s health systems. The population is ageing, with the median age anticipated to reach 49 by 2030, as is the proportion of people suffering from chronic diseases. While many chronic diseases can be avoided or delayed, they are expensive to treat when they do develop. Singapore has a higher suicide rate than many other countries, and mental illness is stigmatized. Similarly, the prevalence of obesity rates in Singapore is rising, especially among children and adolescents. And Singapore is addressing all these head-on.

During my visits to Singapore, I can’t help but see behaviour change signals everywhere, some subtle and some direct. Singapore’s health authorities appear to be working on a war footing to confront emerging health concerns by investing in exceptional health communication.

As a strategy and leadership communication professional, I consider Singapore’s approach to be an accurate implementation of “Health is a Human Right” and “Health in All Policies.”

When I decipher Singapore’s magical public health communication formula, I discover the following precious principles:

One, Audience: Understanding your audience is essential to any public health communication strategy. Who are you targeting? What are their concerns? What drives them? After knowing your audience, you may personalize your message. However, this requires leaving your cosy offices and connecting with people in their homes or workplaces. Public health authorities must likewise give up the idea that they know what’s best for people.

Two, Relevance: your message should address your audience’s worries. They should care about it and recognize how it affects them. In contrast to Singapore, which determines its agenda with limited foreign intervention, low-income countries frequently follow the priorities of their international donors.

Third, Credibility: your message should be founded on solid evidence and originate from a reliable source. As in Singapore, this is made possible by multi-sectoral collaboration. Four, Engagement: your message should be engaging and thought-provoking to captivate your audience. It should inspire curiosity and action. Five, Simple messaging: Your message should be easy to understand and avoid jargon and technical terminology.

Singapore’s health communication formula also includes using a variety of mediums to engage people, such as print, television, radio, social media, and public events. Use humour and storytelling to connect with your audience. Track your public health communication campaign’s performance to see what works and what doesn’t, as this helps campaigns improve over time.

Feedback on health messaging is critical to improve campaigns.

Collecting feedback from audiences on health messaging is critical to improving campaigns.

Singapore has many public health successes. Singaporeans’ rising Type Two Diabetes rate prompted the 2016 “War on Diabetes” campaign. The 2015 “National Steps Challenge” to promote physical activity saw fivefold participation by 2018. The government has created an extensive initiative to support firms of all sizes in obesity prevention and management, chronic illness management, mental health, and smoking cessation.

Singapore’s health initiatives’ interconnectedness is their beauty. The government works with the urban planning sector to design localities that encourage physical activity; with the transportation sector to promote public transportation and make it easier for people to walk, cycle, and use active modes of transportation; with the education sector to promote health education in schools and create a healthy school environment; and with the workplace sector to encourage healthy workplaces.

By linking its public health programs with other vital sectors, Singapore has created a more holistic approach to health promotion that benefits the entire population.

Understanding that communication is a means to an end is critical to Singapore’s health communication success.  Singapore’s health communication programmes are proactive, evidence-based and serve measurable health objectives—infrastructural investments back health campaigns. To give Singaporeans a place to exercise, relax, and mingle this “Planned City” features government-built 59 regional and 271 community parks. They usually have running, cycling, and inline skating paths that link to nearby parks. Parks have many outdoor workout stations. The government also provides healthcare subsidies. This guarantees quality health care for all.

Leadership by example is also a part of Singapore’s health communication strategy. It sends a strong message to the public that healthy living is essential when Singaporean leaders and top civil servants follow what they preach. This encourages better choices. Singapore’s leadership communication strategy frequently includes health and lifestyle messages, demonstrating their importance as a national priority.

What also helps is that Singapore has traditionally had stable governments with enough majority to expedite health-related legislation. The other significant and rare advantages that Singapore enjoys are – one, Singapore has a long history of electing highly educated and trained science political officials, due in part to the country’s emphasis on education and its commitment to developing a knowledge-based economy and two, the presence of an impressive number of self-made female professionals in high-decision making roles. This is recognized to lead to better representation of women’s interests, more diversity of thought, and more decisive leadership.

Why are so few Asian countries able to reproduce the basic recipe for effective health communication a la Singapore? Because corruption, nepotism, or political and bureaucratic greed come in the way.

Singapore’s public health ambassadors are chosen for their health advocacy, not political connections. Singapore’s health promotion platforms are not chosen for personal profit. Similarly, posters and brochures are printed in proportion to audience size instead of commission. Health authorities in many developing Asian nations have piles of obsolete printed material rotting in their warehouses.

Singapore’s performance suggests good governance and low corruption are necessary for effective health communication. Transparency International‘s Corruption Perceptions Index 2022 ranks Singapore fifth least corrupt country out of 180 nations. In 2023, the Chandler Institute of Governance ranked Singapore top in good governance, ahead of Switzerland, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, the UK, and New Zealand.

International development and philanthropic health programmes in low-income countries need to learn from Singapore’s health communication excellence. In the absence of national-level good governance and the presence of high corruption perception among the population, investing in public health communications is bound to yield poor returns.

Donor funding for health communication is highly susceptible to corruption, causing anger over “failed” health promotion efforts and raising questions over donor credibility. So, unless international donor-development agencies want to mainly boost a country’s t-shirt, flex, and poster printing business or provide politicians with a health platform for self-promotion, the funding of health communication portfolios should be carefully reviewed.

Thank you, Singapore. Keep inspiring!

An abridged version of this article appears on page 4 in The Himalayan Times, Nepal, 9th August 2023.

Dr Sunoor Verma is a global health diplomat-practitioner specializing in strategic partnerships, high-level advocacy, and strategic leadership communication. He has supported the work of WHO, UNICEF, UNHCR, UNDP, ECMI and their leaders in building complex coalitions, communicating effectively and devising out-of-the-box solutions in development and humanitarian settings. He has also worked with Boston University, the University of Geneva and Cambridge University on programs that intertwine international relations, global health and conflict resolution.

 

Health communication fatigue looms large

Screenshot 2023-03-24 at 15.12.55

Over-communicating health- can it ever be counterproductive?

We seem to be over-communicating health in the aftermath of COVID-19 and now run the risk of making our communication ineffective the next time a health emergency arises. The miracle of antibiotics, when prescribed appropriately, is best known to the patient whose condition starts improving quickly. However, this does not mean antibiotics are the solution to every illness. If given indiscriminately, the damage can be vast and irreversible. Similar is the case with health communication.

The risk of communication fatigue

While the pandemic showed the necessity of public health communication, it may now be causing communication fatigue among the public. It is essential to review the frequency and volume of health communication. COVID-19 taught governments, health organisations, and public health professionals how to communicate complicated scientific knowledge to the public in an understandable and actionable manner.

In the public interest, centre stage was provided to the World Health Organisation (WHO) to be the lead UN spokesperson on COVID-19. The UN Secretary-General showed admirable discipline in ensuring that Dr Tedros, the Director General of the WHO, leads the UN in critical communication during the pandemic. Health has been at the heart of every important policy debate over the last two years. The audience’s attention gained on the importance of human and animal health can be easily lost if strategic choices are now not made on how much to communicate and what to communicate on health.

In 2020, WHO coined the word Infodemic to describe an outbreak of information, disinformation, rumours, and fake news. Now it seems critical that international health actors do not turn into perpetrators of Infodemics, especially in the context of countries.

Endless marking of health days- risk of losing public trust and credibility

In February, health agencies marked World Cancer Day, International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, International Day of Women and Girls in Science, International Epilepsy Day, and Congenital Heart Defect Awareness Day. Similarly, in March, the impressive line-up is International Women’s Day, World Kidney Day, World Oral Health Day, and World Tuberculosis (TB) Day. And in April, we will mark World Health Day, World Malaria Day, World Immunization Week and World Day for Safety and Health at Work.

The point is that for each of these special days, we see events being organised with elaborate ceremonies, the printing of banners, posters, selfie stands, speeches, t-shirts, standees and most troubling- an avalanche of social media posts with reminders on the importance of whatever is being celebrated. This country level health-Infodemic which I call “HelDemic”, is not limited to the digital space but is also sucking up the valuable time of policymakers and health workers and generating tons of plastic waste.

A lack of interest and compliance is one of the critical concerns of communication fatigue in public health communication. When people are continually bombarded with a lot of information and messaging, they may get desensitised and tune it out. This might lead to a lack of incentive to adopt healthy behaviours or follow public health norms, perhaps increasing disease spread.

Corrective action and celebration triage is needed urgently!

Disease burden and national strategic plans should guide the choice of three to five health days to mark in a year. An uninterrupted barrage of visuals of inaugurations, closing ceremonies and speechmakers on social media is not the best health communication investment and risks reducing the credibility of those seen engaging in this. Effective communication strategies, such as using a variety of communication channels and formats, can help prevent communication fatigue and promote healthy behaviours. Choosing to tone down communication and spacing is also a wise strategy.

Between the devil and the deep sea- tough choices for the poor

This is easier said than done, especially in countries that rely heavily on foreign aid to fund critical services like healthcare. Public employees in these countries are often needed to attend meetings and such events with international donors to seek financing, manage projects, and report on progress. While working with international donors is vital to get funding and promote development programs, there are significant risks involved with public officials becoming overly focused and exposed to ceremonial roles and not being seen in critical policymaking.

Post-COVID-19, the way countries have rolled back special measures like mandatory mask usage, pre-departure forms, and media briefings, it is time to tone down public health communication. The audience needs a breather. There is an urgent need to shift to strategic health communication to achieve focused public health objectives. This approach requires a deep understanding of the local context, the target audience, and the social, cultural, and economic factors that impact health behaviours. Unfortunately, most international health actors are in shortage of talent with the capacity to do this. Worse is the fear that they may not see this need until the next health emergency knocks at our doors.

Time to cut down the noise and deliver solid results!

The globe is falling short of meeting the targets for the health-related Sustainable Development Goals 2030. However, if governments are to meet these targets, they must prioritize policies and execution while reducing general health communication surrounding health days, events, and celebrations. It’s time to turn down the volume and avoid health communication burnout!

Published in The Himalayan Times, Thursday, 16th March 2023. Page 4.

About the Author

Dr Sunoor Verma is a global health practitioner. He has advised WHO, UNICEF, UNHCR, HUG-Geneva and Cambridge University on Strategy, Leadership Communication, Advocacy and Resource Mobilization. He is credited with setting up WHO’s communication portfolio from scratch in Nepal in the midst of COVID-19. He has set up and led the country and regional operations for the European Centre for Minority Issues in the Balkans. He has supported track two peace processes in Macedonia, Kosovo and Sri Lanka and emergency response to the Tsunami, Avian Influenza and COVID-19. He has taught Global Health at Boston University. He has curated partnership initiatives with Macedonia, Kosovo, Germany, Switzerland, Australia, and Nepal parliamentarians. He divides his time between the foothills of the Jura Mountains in France and Buddhanilkantha in Nepal.